Anycubic Photon Printer Owners 造訪社團 » resolution

Good morning please someone who can suggest the best configuration for printing this ring? We need the maximum detail resolution and we will use Anycubic green resin ... thank you very much for your help.

翻譯年糕

Does any one have their hands on a photon zero or a print made by them. I'm curious of the quality with the lower resolution screen. Does any one have their hands on a photon zero or a print made by them. I'm curious of the quality with the lower resolution screen. 翻譯年糕

Is this a direct replacement for the Photon ??? I see people say it is but there are also comments otherwise.
TIA

ELEGOO 5.5'' Inch 2K LCD for Mars 3D Printer with 2560x1440 Resolution and Tempered Glass Protection, Sharp LS055R1SX04 Light Curing Display with MIPI Connector, Compatible with Anycubic Photon

這是光子的直接替代嗎??? 我看到人們說它是, 但也有其他評論.
阿姨姑姑

Elegoo 5.5 ''英吋2 k lcd, 火星3 d印表機, 具有2560 x1440解析度和溫度玻璃保護, 尖銳的ls05r1sx04光修復顯示器, 與任何立方體相容任何立方光子https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07X586JHK/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_E0BxEbY7C4JH7

· 查看原文 · 為此翻譯評分

I've seen people say the photon's minimum layer height is .02mm. Why? Is it somehow unable to print at the resolution the stepmotor would suggest?

翻譯年糕

Phrozen Sonic Mini is .....

Just crazy unbelievable. The led’s are about 1.5 inches below the bubble glass, so it “throws” the light to the lcd. Their 95% uniform light is 100% correct. Mono chrome lcd cures the resin to at least 3x the strength as the photon s does, and at half the cure time. And this 3x strength is the same thru the entire area of the build plate.
Build plate is dead flat. Resin pools on top but I made a drip hanger tool.
Downside is the 67um vs 47um resolution is more noticeable then I thought it would be.
Can’t wait for a higher resolution monochrome printer, too much of an improvement.

翻譯年糕

Dyna-soar in 172nd and 148th scale.
And while it is true I am taking many requests to design models for others at the heart of it only two of been on my mind from the beginning Skylab and the Boeing x20 Dyna-Soar.
Here we see the 172nd scale on the left and the 1/48 scale on the right. In the middle is a cutaway of the first and second stage of the Titan core stage.
While I printed the motors down to 1/200 scale much of the detail is forfeited by nature of resolution of the printer.

翻譯年糕

Hello, I´m curious is there any conversion or way how to convert Anycubic display to 4K resolution? because printing small parts for models at 1/48 or 72 could be better with higher resolution

翻譯年糕

Hi, I'm looking to print something on my photon at a higher resolution. Going from a .05 to a .02. As a general rule, how much do you reduce the exposure settings for this sort of change?

翻譯年糕

So recently I acquired a Longer Orange 10, I wanted to compare it to the Anycubic Photon I've owned for a while now. Since the Photon S has been released, the original Photon price has been around the 250$ or less. The Orange 10 price is 209$ on amazon right now. So with similar price I figure the two would be comparable. In the picture are two figures I printed, the one with the white base was done with the Photon, the one with the supports is the Orange 10. Sorry my camera sucks. Both was printed with Anycubic Grey resin at 50 micron layers. Here is the link to the model I used, it has a ton of detail that neither print was able to capture all of at this scale.

So to start both printers are good printers, but the devil is in the details. With resin printers that's what we are paying for. The thing I liked most about the Orange 10 is the software. The Longer slicer is much more polished, it's not buggy in the least. It's easy to use and offers more setting to work with. It slices files nearly instantaneous and doesn't lag with a lot of high detail models loaded. Also has a fixer built in. Both printers are compatible with Chitubox, so this maybe a mute point.

Another thing I really liked about the Orange 10 was the bed. Particularly the bed leveling system, it easier to use and more robust vs the Photon. Though the Orange does have a smaller build volume.

Some things I don't like about the Orange, the enclosure. It's 5 pieces of acrylic literally held together with rubber bands. It doesn't fit tight or secure. Compared to the Photon's metal frame and horizontal door, the orange is just cheap. A point in favor of the orange, it doesn't have a fan inside of the enclosure. So resin odors isn't nearly as strong.

So the main advantage to the Photon is the resolution, the Photon has a 2560x1440 screen vs the Orange 10 854x480. So that's a pretty big difference in pixels, but in practice, its not as significant. It does affect things though at 28mm scale. It's faint but the lower resolution creates layer lines perpendicular to build plate.

So my preference would be the Photon, it maybe more difficult to use. But when it works, it just does the job better.

翻譯年糕

Ever smaller.
I have been asked by a number of people how small I think the motors for the Titan missile can be printed here I've taken it all the way down to 1/200 scale and this little dissertation explains the pitfalls oh printing it ever smaller scales
In resin you also have to consider the resolution of the image set the particular screen that you're using can produce. And it's obvious that smaller scales a regular cell phone screen loses detail as it moves down the scale.

翻譯年糕